SCIENCE STEP YOUR GAME UP: HEAR ME OUT

Self-awareness?

1. Humans are self-aware. we receive self-awareness from anywhere between 3-5 years of age.
2. Whatever intelligence humans have between these ages are the intelligence necessary for self-awareness.
3. There are animals (Chimpanzee, Orangutan, Octopuses, Dolphins, etc…) That also reach the same intelligence as humans when we gain self-awareness. Some animals are extremely intelligent. For instance, a dolphin’s EQ (emotional intelligence) is extraordinarily high. Dolphins have been spoken of by scientists as “non-human” persons, they are so smart.
4. Therefore, they also have sufficient intelligence for self-awareness, and they should have self-awareness.
5. If you say no, then you are denying logic, or you must be in the only other option for reason below-

THE ONLY OTHER WAY THIS COULD WORK OUT

1. no animals have self-awareness except the human species.
2. Self-awareness is a monumental benefit to any species, so much that humans are superior to all other species largely in part because of it.
3. Evolution chose to give the human species self-awareness and not any other species on the planet.
4. Why did the human species gain self-awareness over all other creatures, even though some other species hit the same minimal Intelligence for awareness?

Science is always attempting to compare human intelligence to animals. I’d love to hear what science has to say on this situation.

Sorry science I don’t have a PHD, so you denied my twenty-page paper to your journals, maybe consider not committing internal credential fallacies and actually look at people’s ideas?

If I discovered the cure to all diseases in a bottle, they’d probably deny the paper. Science should focus on logic, rationale and facts over credentials and paper format.

It’s all love, but I feel good ideas should be accepted over logistics.

Just accept good ideas.

-Jarom